Tuesday, November 1, 2011

The Systems Development Lifecycle - a fundamental, natural human process

Folks:

One thing you need to understand about the System Development Lifecycle (SDLC) is that each model is simply one author's way of describing (or “modeling”) a fundamental, natural process that we humans use instinctively to make anything from tonight's family dinner, to a global Business Information System (BIS), to landing a person on Mars.

While there are, admittedly, quite a few more tasks to be completed in landing a human on Mars than in getting tonight's dinner (unless I'm cooking...but that's another story!), both activities take an idea and bring it to fruition. The base process is the same every time. It's the same whether there is one person or one hundred thousand people involved in making the idea come true.

The thing that's always amazed me, though, is that although most of us use this process every day, it is such an ingrained part of us that most times most folks don't even realize they're using the SDLC...it's just the way things get done.
Join me as I use the SDLC to put together tonight's typical family dinner. We'll:


  • Start with a problem (“darned kids are hungry again! I just fed them last night!”),
  • Develop some options to solve the problem (“Let's see, what are my options. I guess I could let them go hungry, I could order pizza (again), or I could try to cook something for them here”),
  • Choose the best option for our situation (“I better make dinner here. I'll catch heck from my lovely better half if I feed the kids pizza three nights in a row!”);
  • Develop a specification (“Let's see, I better give them some veggies tonight...and no fish! There's no way I'm fighting to get little Janie to eat THAT again!”);
  • Design the product / system / dinner (“Cookbook....where the heck did that darned thing get to?!?”);
  • Build the product (“Ok. I've got the peas and carrots in the microwave. It says fifty minutes at 300 degrees for the chicken nuggets and fries...but the kids are hungry...I can speed this up....fifteen minutes at 500 degrees should work, right?”);
  • Test the product (“Ooooo...are those burned?”)
  • Fix the problems and retest (“If I scrape off the black spots and use a lot of ketchup, the kids will never know the difference!”)
  • Deliver the product to the customer (“Come on, Janie, eat! Daddy worked really hard on this dinner! You'll hurt Daddy's feelings if you don't eat!”)
  • Maintain, update and/or correct errors (“Hello, Bocce Club Pizzeria? Yeah, it's me again. Same order as last night. Yeah, delivery. Thanks. And if you promise not to tell my wife, there's an extra $20 in it for you. Yeah...again.!”)

    Well, this is typical dinner at my house (at least when my wife works late!). But I think you get the idea. The SDLC isn't some complex process that was developed by and can only be implemented by some secret (and exorbitantly expensive) cabal of Information Technology (IT) Professionals and Business Consultants...although as an IT Professional and Business Consultant, I will admit many of my colleagues would love everyone to believe that.

    Of course, the more complex the idea you are trying to bring to fruition, the more time and money it is going to take to make it happen. A typical Mom (or Dad) preparing dinner for her family might complete the entire project lifecycle - from need Identification (“darn, the kids are probably hungry!”) to Project Wrap-up (“Whew, the dishes are FINALLY done!”) - in an hour or two; while the team working to put a person on Mars will take decades and maybe trillions of dollars to get through theirs.

    Understand that. regardless of which model you use to describe this process, each of the steps must be completed and, with a few exceptions that aren't relevant to this discussion, those steps must be completed order.

    It's the way it works for virtually every human endeavor.

    ____________________________

    I'd love to hear what you think. Feel free to leave a comment here or e-mail me at: TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com.

  • Thursday, June 9, 2011

    Wikipedia is Not Satanic!

    I am currently an active (albeit part time) member of the faculty of two universities and one college. All three of these institutions of higher learning (and all universities and colleges, I assume) have a policies against students using Wikipedia as an approved research source for assignments or scholarly papers of any kind. As an employee of these institutions of higher learning, I understand the policies and fully comply with them, even though I do not agree with them. And here's why I don't. 

    As a training, business management and IT (Information Technology) professional outside the university setting, however, I have found Wikipedia to be at least as well, and sometimes better, verified and supported than "mainstream" sources in the area(s) of these professions. 

    While I absolutely agree that one needs to be careful to verify the information found in Wikipedia, the exact same thing is true about EVERY source, even such mainstream paragons of research virtue as this course's text book, the Encyclopedia Britannica and virtually ANY mainstream media outlet.  At least Wikipedia makes it clear when material in an article is NOT confirmed, verified or fully / properly supported. They flag those articles with a notice to that effect and ask for help from readers verifying and/or correcting the material.

    To my knowledge, none of the mainstream outlets does this. 

    If you look at the number of cases in recent years where such paragons of mainstream research virtue have published fiction as fact ("faction"); where other people's work is published  as their own; where unverified statements and works of "faction" from one media outlet is propagated around the world by other media outlets who don't bother to check even their most basic facts. Virtually every mainstream media outlet has had more than one of these type incidents in recent years, including The New York Times, The New York Post, The Wall Street Journal, CNN, ABC, NBC, and  FoxNews.

    Do a Google search on "plagiarism scandals in _________" (fill in virtually any profession, publication or broadcast channel) and you may be surprised at exactly how poorly vetted these "trusted" sources really are.  

    Visit
    http://gawker.com/5721413/plagiarism-scandal-reveals-espn-people-actually-write-down-that-stuff-they-say to see a few of the current scandals.

    Read the article on "Plagiarism in medical / scientific literature" found at
    http://journals.lww.com/cardiovascularpharm/Fulltext/2010/12000/Plagiarism_in_the_Medical_Scientific_Literature.17.aspx.

    Additionally, the fact that virtually anyone can offer articles for publication (not every article submitted is automatically published) means that it is easier for new ideas to be published and offered for professional peer review than in the "established" professional journals where financial gain and internal politics often play a larger part in what gets published than "truth" and "fact". In most articles on professional topics, the fact that there are so many practitioners reading the article and the fact that practitioners in the field have an opportunity to comment on and challenge the article, actually works to make Wikipedia a better-vetted source than any other I'm aware of.

    Having said all this, of course, and in compliance with University / College policy, I, of course inform all my students in all my courses that Wikipedia is not an acceptable source to use for their assignments...but I can't stop them from using it in the real world.

    There. I met my "toe-the-party-line" professional obligations.

    ____________________________
    This BLOG is based on an answer I wrote to a student's question on 01/08/2011. I'd love to hear what you think. Feel free to leave a comment here or e-mail me at: TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com.

    Tuesday, May 17, 2011

    Cats and dogs and kids and peace and quiet

    I originally posted the following on the emigrant.ie's discussion boards in response to a question about cats, dogs and the grander meaning of life. I just found it and thought some of you might enjoy reading it. The original posting can be found at the link associated with this posting.


    We currently have (along with assorted kids, fish and "wild" animals roaming the property) 4 cats and a dog. Three of the cats are older (10 to 14 years old) who have not gotten along with each other in all the years we've had them (since kittenhood for all of them). The 4th cat is the latest stray...about 3 - 4 months old and quickly learning not to bother the other cats.

    The dog was a "drop-off" we took in as a puppy back in March. She's part of the family and has come to an uneasy truce with at least one of the cats. She is constantly trying to "play" with the kitten, but her size, noise and exuberance seem to scare the kitten (who's a bit skittish, as strays often are) away.

    Since my wife and I are also all too often "all-too-pragmatic" people, we set certain rules that limit interaction between the species within our family's pet population - carefully watching the interactions to ensure no one ends up dead, mangled or too emotionally scarred for life.

    On the other hand, since we have heard stories of cats and dogs living together in harmony and, since we are also eternal optimists in this area, from time to time we attempt to "forcibly integrate" the family pets - putting them into (heavily controlled) situations where they are forced to interact with each other. It is rarely successful from an integration standpoint, but it is (almost) always entertaining.

    If you've read this far, you're probably beginning to wonder what all this has to do with answering Wildside's initial question.

    The simple truth is - I don't know.

    I was actually hoping that the act of documenting these experiences would bring some earth-shattering, universal truth to light for me...and that by relating these truths in this message, I would become the "hero of the thread" (a position which actually exists when I'm "in my happy place").

    Unfortunately, all this has done for me is to highlight the fact that I have no answer to any of this and that the only thing I know to do is to keep slogging through each day - trying to contain the violence in each situation and celebrating the small victories (like the fact that at least one of our cats can now sit in the same room as the dog without constantly trying to scratch her nose).

    Ouch, my head hurts now!

    ____________________________

    I'd love to hear what you think. Feel free to leave a comment here or e-mail me at: TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com.

    Wednesday, May 4, 2011

    We are Americans...let's start acting like it..

    In case you haven't heard, Osama Bin Laden, public enemy number one, has been killed by a US Navy Seal Team who raided his hiding place in Pakistan.

    Understandably, there has been much rejoicing over and numerous celebrations of his death.

    Unfortunately, too many of these celebrations and too much of this rejoicing is more evidence of blood lust than justifiable gratitude and thankfulness that an enemy has been vanquished.

    I think this is a very good time to stop and reflect on what this momentous event, and our reactions to it, say about us . While some relief and thankfulness is right and proper, the wild public celebration of death and destruction needs to stop.

    We are Americans. We hold ourselves to a higher standard. We are better than that.

    We see value in every human life. We don't rejoice in death and killing. We do not revel in slaughter and gore. We are not barbarians clothing ourselves in the bodies and washing ourselves in the blood of our enemies.

    We don't gloat over the vanquished. We quietly extend our hand to help a vanquished enemy become a friend and mourn the loss of life on both sides that every war inevitably brings. We heal the wounds, we rebuild the cities and we help repair the damage once the fight is over.

    We are Americans. We forgive.

    We are publicly grateful for our forefathers who gave their lives to gain and keep the freedoms we have. And we are quietly proud and thankful that our nation still produces men and women with the fortitude and will to keep and protect these freedoms for us and the courage to extend them to others. And we are sorrowful that we still live in a world where it is sometimes necessary for those good men and women to sacrifice their lives in that pursuit.

    We are Americans. Let's start acting like it.

    Pray for America.

    ____________________________

    I'd love to hear what you think. Feel free to leave a comment here or e-mail me at: TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com.

    Saturday, April 30, 2011

    e-Books and electronic readings

    I recently read an on-line discussion of the new "electronic Books" (e.g. Amazon Kindle, iBooks; Sony Reader, etc.) and it got me thinking (again!) about the advances in electronics, display technology and software made over the last decade. 

    I've really only seen one Kindle and that only for a short time. I WAS impressed, though that they seem to have solved that "can't see the screen in direct, bright sunshine" issue.

    I was on a beach in the mid-day Florida sunshine and saw a woman reading one about 50 feet away. Even from an oblique angle at that distance and with my poor (corrected) vision, I could distinctly make out separate lines of text (I couldn't read the words, but that was an eyes / distance thing!). 

    I also liked that they've done a LOT to bring as much of the "look and feel" of a paper book to the electronic screen.  The pages turn, the "paper page" has a textured look to it and the fonts looked like they'd been type-set, not generated by a computer.

    Having said all that, though, I'm still not sure I'll ever give up my paper books.

    With all your experience with on-line sources and electronic readings, what do YOU think?

    ____________________________
    I'd love to hear what you think. Feel free to leave a comment here or e-mail me at: TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com.

    Tuesday, April 12, 2011

    Business Information System Terminology

    Business planning systems typically fall into one of three categories: MRP (Manufacturing Resource Planning), ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning); or SCM (Supply Chain Management) systems. Although these terms are sometimes used interchangeably in some organizations, and despite the fact that as systems have matured the demarcation lines between MRP, ERP and SCM have become blurred; these terms and the systems they refer to generally indicate three different levels of system scope and complexity. As you might also have imagined, each step up the “evolutionary ladder” of business planning systems also typically represents a “step up” in purchase price and system maintenance costs. We’ll address this issue later in the article.
    • Automated Data Processing Systems the precursor to the modern business planning systems, these systems were focused on automating the bookkeeping functions within the organization. Companies such as IBM, ADP, Oracle and other big names cut their teeth automating business bookkeeping and accounting tasks. The lessons learned, the principles developed, and the benefits customers gained from these early business process automation efforts laid the foundation of the industry of business information systems we know today.
    • MRP (Manufacturing Resource Planning) Systems represent the first and, at least theoretically, the least complex stage of business planning system development. Initially titled “Material Requirements Planning” systems, MRP is now generally accepted to mean “Manufacturing Resource Planning” systems. As you might have guessed, current MRP systems typically encompass the manufacturing and manufacturing-related operations within a single organization or location. Some consider the early MRP systems to be the computer industry’s first attempt at building true management information systems outside the “pure accounting” functions of a company.
    Typically built around the Bill of Material (BOM), early MRP systems were little more than computerized parts/material tracking and ordering systems, generating data and basic information for use by off-line planners. These systems were a huge improvement over older manual manufacturing planning methods. MRP systems also represented a watershed moment is computer systems development, proving to customers that the computer had many more possible applications than simplifying accounting & payroll functions.
    As MRP systems technology matured and stabilized, systems capabilities naturally expanded from simple parts tracking and ordering systems to encompass more and more of the manufacturing and manufacturing-related planning, reporting and control tasks, activities & operations within customer organizations.
    Although MRP systems have been with us the longest, they are by no means obsolete systems. The fact that they’ve been around quite a while means that most MRP systems are extremely stable, (relatively) easy to use and require little system maintenance. MRP systems are still being built, sold, maintained and improved by vendors and many companies find this level of business planning and control is sufficient to meet their needs.
    • ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) Systems represent the second generation business planning and control systems. They generally encompass planning and reporting for all the operations, organizations and locations within a single company (or family of companies). Enterprise Resource Planning systems came about because, as customers’ reliance on MRP systems grew, system developers/sellers added more and more functions and capabilities to satisfy their customers’ needs. Unfortunately in many cases, these functions and capabilities were added to the systems piecemeal, tacked onto the system architecture wherever they would fit. . This often meant that the systems themselves got became cumbersome to use and a nightmare to maintain. And in many companies with operations spread across wide expanses of geography, each location / operation / division used a different MRP system, making the sharing of management information within the company a virtual impossibility.
    Recognizing these problems, MRP system manufacturers started working with customers to develop more streamlined systems which could meet the management and control information needs throughout the customer’s entire enterprise. While ERP systems sometimes incorporate and often replace earlier (legacy) MRP systems, because they were being built as “next generation” systems, they were able to more effectively incorporate expanded technology capabilities and build on “lessons learned” from years spent developing, improving and maintaining MRP systems.
    ERP systems also represent a step forward in the capabilities arena. Many of these systems were designed to encompass the virtually every area of a company’s operations – from manufacturing to finance, to human resources, purchasing and shipping and receiving. This allowed true “enterprise wide” business planning and control and, although the initial switch-over from a MRP to an ERP system could sometimes be painful, the ability to standardize and share planning and forecasting data and information among and between all organizations, divisions and locations of the organization gave early adopters a true competitive advantage over their competitors.
    • SCM (Supply Chain Management) Systems are the latest growth stage for business planning systems. As the name implies, Supply Chain Management systems typically offer all the functions and capabilities of the MRP & ERP systems, but expand their reach outside a single enterprise, allowing companies to standardize, share, and update business reporting, planning and forecasting information with their entire supply chain: including suppliers, customers, shareholders and, in some cases, government regulatory agencies.
    Although the concept of a system to track, report on and manage a company’s entire supply chain has been around pretty much since the beginning of MRP development in the late 1960’s or early 1970’s, until the late 1990’s data storage and processor technology hadn’t developed sufficient robustness or speed (in other words, the cost was prohibitive) to handle the massive computing and storage requirements such a system demanded. The internet-driven demand for increased storage, processing and long-haul data transfer capabilities (which started in earnest the mid-1990’s) has increased computing capabilities and lowered prices to the point where true Supply Chain Management systems are not only feasible, they are now affordable for many companies.
    True SCM systems almost always require cooperation between suppliers and customers, between developers and planners, and, often, between competing SCM systems.
    As you can see, there is a definite hierarchy in business planning systems. Not every company needs or even wants a full-blown Supply Chain Management system, but most companies could benefit from at least some form of MRP, ERP or SCM system – even companies who deliver services rather than building product.
    There are a myriad of MRP, ERP and SCM systems on the market. Each of these (and, dare I say, each of the selling companies) has its good points and its bad. Most have some “unique” feature - things that other companies don't offer and that the seller hopes to make you believe are indispensable to running and managing your business. And virtually all these business planning systems come complete with “maintenance agreements” which promise to (and sometimes actually do) keep your system up-to-date and growing right along with your business...and which, of course, ensure the seller builds and maintains a steady income stream in the years after the initial system sale.

    ____________________________ I'd love to hear what you think. Feel free to leave a comment here or e-mail me at: TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com.

    Monday, February 7, 2011

    February Football Half-Time Fiasco

     Well another "Big Game" come and gone...and a bit of a disappointment, this one was, too (I don't want to use the term "Super B__L" term and risk getting the NFL's Legal Team after me!).

    The game was "OK", but since I really didn't care about either team, there wasn't any real emotional connection.

    There were a few good new advertisements, but there certainly weren't any ground-breakingly interesting ones.  Certainly there were none that we'll still be talking about next month, let alone next year at this time!

    And then, of course, we had the half-time show. Putting it bluntly: It sucked!

    While I do try to keep an open mind and I'll admit we don't have a stereo TV (nor a flat-screen digital, for that matter), but from a pure "quality of the production" stand-point, that was a horrible show.  I suspect the sponsor of that debacle is re-thinking their investment in next year's 15 minute stadium spectacle.

    The instruments were drowned out by crowd noise and the over-pumped vocals to the point where, for most of the time, it was an a cappella performance...and a poor one at that. Case in point, when the camera cut to the line of horn players blowing up a storm, there were no "horn" sounds at all. The musicians instruments seemed to have had no amplification! The performance by Slash was another example...his guitar was no where near as loud as the singer's voice.

    The artists' voices, on the other hand, came across flat, dull and (sometimes) off key. I suspect this was due in part to the fact they couldn't hear their accompaniment, and in part because they were singing louder than normal to try to get above the crowd noise.

    As for the glowing people, while an interesting tableau, it didn't seem to have any real connection to the (non-existent) music nor the words of the various songs being sung.

    I like (some) of the Black-eyed Peas', Usher's and Guns & Roses' music...but last night's half-time show was not one of their better performances. I suspect we won't see a thread here 5 or 6 years from now, wistfully reminiscing about how great this performance was (remember the recent discussion of U-2's Super Bowl performance).

    I listen to a lot of different music, but I won't be listening to that performance again. :-)

    ____________________________  

    I'd love to hear what you think. Feel free to leave a comment here or e-mail me at: TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com.

    Monday, November 8, 2010

    Management Tasks: Organizing

    Dictionary.com defines “organizing” in part as:

    to systematize...to give organic structure or character to...

    As managers, it's our responsibility to make sure the team, the materials and the work is given some (hopefully) logical, rational structure.

    So exactly how do we do this? How do we decide what goes where, who does what and when it all happens?

    help us organize the people, the work and the resources we have to do the job.

    First, we've got to know what it is we're trying to do. This, of course is one of the things we hope our plan will do – give us a clear idea of what needs to be done, when it needs to be done and what tools we have to get it done.

    Second, we've got to know the organization we've already got in place – what's working and what's not. For new programs / projects / companies, this is a pretty simple thing – we've got no organization. In this happy case, we can do whatever works best for us, our personality, our management style and our people. We're free to arrange things pretty much any way we want. we decide who works for who, where folks sit, where the copier is located and, sometimes even pick the color scheme for the facility. It's a great gig when we can get it.

    However, most managers aren't that lucky. We often have little in who works for us, where our offices are located, or what the floor plan looks like. And we'll virtually never have a chance to pick a color scheme (“institutional green”, anyone?).

    In most companies, critical things like facilities, equipment, tools and staff are assigned to projects based on priorities established well outside the project itself. And the lower priority our project, the less say we'll have over any of the things that are assigned to us.

    When we find ourselves in this situation and we've done everything short of tendering our resignation to get what we want, don't complain. Just take a deep breath, paste a big smile on our faces and remember, “adversity builds character”.

    Then we take a critical look at the people, tools, facilities and materials you've got to work with. Identify those pieces that already work well and leave them alone. If there are folks who've worked well together in the past, keep them working together on your projects whenever we can

    Then find the stuff that isn't working so well and fix it. Reassign people, rearrange furniture, re-plan work, get new tools; whatever it takes to get your team working efficiently and effectively.

    Third, we've got to decide where things go. “A place for everything and everything in its place”. Do we team our people by specialty (Engineering, Production, Accounting, etc.) or by what part of the project their work most affects (hydraulics, wing, fuselage, etc.)? Do we assign tasks by position or by the likelihood the work will get done? Do we use the company's central stock room for project specific parts or establish an project stock room for “our stuff”?

    Finally, we've got to keep tabs on the work...and be ready to re-organize when the structure we put in place doesn't work. I don't advocate re-organizing out of hand or on a whim (rotating bald tires), but there are times when how we've organized things gets in the way of getting the work done. When that happens, we need to be able to recognize it quickly and change fix the problems.
    Remember, though, that reorganizations cause problems of their own. They almost always add stress, interrupt work flow and reduce morale. Even moving one person from one desk to another will have it's issues, so we need to plan carefully and make sure the benefits of the reorg far outweigh the problems it will cause.



    ____________________________  

    If you need help getting organized, feel free to contact me at: TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com.

    Wednesday, October 6, 2010

    Management Tasks - Planning


    Planning is a tough subject to teach. Written descriptions of the planning process tend to be dry and boring. Case studies and examples, while more interesting than a plain process description, tend to be too general and off topic. There don't seem to be any really good movies made or novels written about teams completing their critical “Annual Planning”...and all the planning pantomimes I've seen have been....well...let's just say they were “disturbing” and leave it at that.
    So the rest of this posting will attempt to describe planning words......for you to read. Try not to fall asleep.
    As I said, planning is one of the most critical management tasks. For many people, it's planning that they think of when they hear the word “management”. “The Plan” is often the most obvious (dare I say “only”?) evidence that a manager has actually done any work at all.

    A typical development project has three planning stages / phases that must be completed before work can start:
    • Concept development
    • Specification development
    • Work & resource scheduling
    Others will have their own ways of describing these steps, and some experts might add or delete a few from my list, but this is how I have come to think of it.


    Concept Development is all about possibilities. This is the time to let imaginations run wild, to look at “crazy” ideas and to have fun thinking. The beginning of this phase is also the time to ignore all the operations, financial and other constraints that will become so critical later in the planning process. During the early stages concept development, getting the team's imaginations going is critical.

    As managers, it's our job during this phase is to make sure that all viable possibilities are explored, and to make sure options aren't dropped from consideration prematurely. It amazes me how often an idea that is initially ignored or ridiculed by the team turns out to be the optimal solution. Customer desires / needs should be used to guide work done during this phase of the planning.

    At the end of the concept development stage you should have a clearly defined conceptual framework within which the final remainder of the project will be developed. This framework should be as flexibly defined as possible, but it needs to have sufficient detail and structure to allow designers, planners and operational personnel to figure out what they will need to do to turn the concept into a reality.


    Specification Development is the next step in the process. In this stage, the concept starts to become more than a good idea. This is the stage where the final deliverable items are defined, where quality standards are developed, and where risks and restrictions are used to modify and refine the concept.

    It is here that those real-world operational, customer, financial, technology and other constraints that we happily ignored during most of the concept development phase start to wield their power. Here is where the final product, process, deliverable or system starts to take shape.

    During this stage the first design decisions made, budgets are developed and approved and specific personnel requirements are defined. In detail. For everything that needs to be done.

    At the end of this stage you should have a completed, detailed technical specification and/or Statement (or Scope) of Work (SOW) that has been reviewed and approved by all stakeholders. It is typical (and highly desirable) to have an approved budget at the end of this stage.


    Work and Resource Scheduling - the final phase in planning, this is where the final “Who, what where and when” details of the project are worked out. This is what most people think of when they think of planning.

    Here we decide the specific tasks (down to the one week or one day detail) that need to be done in order to successfully complete the project. We decide how many people we will need with what skill sets and experience levels. We figure out what resources, materials, equipment and facilities we will need. And, of course, we figure out when we will need all these people, places and things...and how we can get them and not break the budget.

    The output of this phase should be a completed schedule showing every task to be completed, who's going to complete it, what they need in order to complete it and when / how long it will take. Preferably this schedule will be input into some sort of information system and “automated”.

    Programs like Primavera, Microsoft Project and others have become very good tools for developing and tracking project tasks, resources and personnel.

    One final thought.

    Before we go, though, there is one thing you need to keep in mind about planning:

    the act of planning is often of greater value than the plan itself!

    Remember, most plans are obsolete before they're even published. Competitor's actions, customer tastes, technological advances and simple personnel turnover can all force the plan to change.

    But if we've done a thorough job of planning, if we've gotten to know our environment, if we've identified the risks and gotten a solid understanding of our options, these changes will have fewer and less severe impacts on our business. And that, after all, is the whole point of planning, isn't it?
     

    ____________________________  
    I'd love to hear what you think. Feel free to leave a comment here or e-mail me at: TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com.

    Monday, September 27, 2010

    Integrity

    The first trait on my “Traits of a Good Manager?” list are high personal integrity and moral courage.

    Integrity (2010), according to Dictionary.com, is: “adherence to moral and ethical principles; soundness of moral character; honesty.”

    The first step in this process, as I discussed in my May 27, 2010 blog, is for each of us to figure out what moral standards and ethical principles we are going to follow.

    We must first form, and then inform, our conscience!

    We must model the behavior we want from our employees. Without integrity, it's tough, if not impossible, to lead people for very long.

    Integrity brings moral courage with it. Integrity forces us to tell the truth even when it puts us (or the company) in a bad light. Integrity is the foundation of our commitment to doing the right thing even when it might cost us our job (or the company money). Integrity gives us the courage to stand up and say “this isn't right when no one else dares.

    And it is Integrity that gives us the authority to lead”...and the right to call ourselves leaders.

    So, my friends, I hope you'll take some time to look at your life and your actions and change them to conform to the words you spout to your people every day.

    ____________________________

    I'd love to hear what you think. Feel free to leave a comment here or e-mail me at: TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com.

    Monday, September 20, 2010

    Management Basics


    In last week's entry, I talked about Management as a profession. There I listed a number of the key tasks and skills accomplished by professional managers. In this and the next few blogs, I will look at these tasks and skills in greater detail.
    The primary management tasks are:
    • Leading
    • Planning
    • Budgeting
    • Organizing
    • Staffing
    • Communicating
    • Directing
    • Risk management
    Character / personality traits critical to a successful manager:
    • High personal integrity and moral courage.
    • An ability to communicate clearly through the written and spoken word.
    • A desire to know people and help them improve their performance.
    • An innate sense of justice and a desire to be fair and evenhanded in his/her treatment of others.
    • A commitment to excellence.
    • High tolerance for stress.
    • An passion for order and organization.
    This list is in no particular order, nor is it comprehensive. Ask any manager, though, what are the main things he or she does and I'm pretty sure most of these will be in virtually every manager's list.

    As for the character / personality traits, I know there are a lot of managers out there missing one or more of the critical traits I listed; heck, I've worked for a few myself. I suspect, though, that most folks would want their bosses / employees to have at least these few good traits. I know they're the biggies I look for when hiring managers...and when deciding whether to work with a client or not.

    ___________________________

    Whether you agree or disagree, I'd love to hear what you think. Feel free to leave a comment here or e-mail me at: TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com.

    Monday, September 13, 2010

    Management is a Profession

    Webster's II New Riverside University Dictionary defines a profession as “...an occupation or vocation requiring training in the liberal arts or the sciences and advanced study in a specialized field.” Dictionary.com defines a profession as “...a vocation requiring knowledge of some department of learning or science: the profession of teaching...”. 

    Management is a Profession.
    It has a defined body of “specialized” knowledge. It has specialized tool and techniques. It requires certain skills of its practitioners. These management tools, techniques and skills are equally applicable, useful and effective across industries, activities and cultures.

    Management is a Profession.

    It's practitioners and their skills are as transferable across industries as those of the medical, engineering, security of legal professions. The skills necessary to successfully plan, organize, staff, support and control a half-billion dollar software development project are the same necessary to successfully run a half-billion dollar power plant construction project.

    Management is a Profession.

    And yet, it never ceases to amaze me how many otherwise intelligent people in other professions fail to get that. Often the same people who accept that an electrical engineer, a human resources specialist, a lawyer or even a CEO can be effective in any industry refuse see accept that effective project managers can be effective regardless of the type of project or the industry in which they practice their profession.

    For some reason, these folks fail to realize that management is a profession in and of itself and that it is just as likely that a project manager who is effective running a half-billion dollar software development program will be just as effective running a half-billion dollar power plant construction project. I've seen companies turn highly-skilled engineers into untrained, ineffective “project managers” simply because these individuals “know our business”. The fact that they knew nothing about putting together a coherent plan, had never developed a budget, did not understand how to control costs, and really hated dealing with people didn't stop these companies from setting up their nominal manager for certain failure.

    Management is a Profession.

    Professional managers are trained to plan and schedule complex projects, coordinating the work of myriad different professions to successfully complete the project. Professional managers are skilled at identifying, avoiding and mitigating risks in all areas. They are trained to develop detailed budgets. They understand how to direct and control the work of others; to reduce costs and earn the company a profit. Professional managers are trained to find, organize and motivate other skilled people to achieve the company's specific goals and objectives.

    Professional managers understand the importance of communicating clearly. They are skilled at reading, understanding and negotiating practical, workable contracts that eliminate problems, rather than contribute to them. They help guide other professions in developing the standards and specifications needed to effectively define the amount and quality of the work to be done. Professional managers are able to get folks in diverse different professions to understand each others' terminology, skills and professional needs.

    Professional managers are experts at building solid customer relations and they know how to repair customer relationships that have broken down. They provide a buffer between upper management and the operations personnel tagged to “get the job done”.

    Management is a profession...and professional managers are critical to the success of virtually every commercial, and most non-commercial organizations in the world today.

    ____________________________
    I'd love to hear what you think. Feel free to leave a comment here or e-mail me at: TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com.

    Monday, September 6, 2010

    Is Social Marketing Right For You?

    You hear a lot about social networking these days and the value that “being connected” can bring to your business. You can tell it's the latest trend, because all the “business experts” are pushing us to get onto Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, and LinkedIn. There are classes and courses and a lot of folks who profess to be “gurus” on how to use these great new tools to help your business grow.

    Let me tell you a secret: there is no secret to making social networking work for you.

    It's just another way to reach your current and potential future customers. As with every other marketing method, approach and tool, you've still got to address the basics.

    1. You've got to know your customers. You've got to know who they are, when and where they buy, how they make decisions and what they want and need. If your prime customers don't use Facebook and still think “twitter” is a semi-embarrassed laugh in church, then social networking is probably not going to work for you.

    2. You've got to know your tools. You have to spend time to learn how Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and other sites work; how people use them and how they will work best for you.

    3. You've got to decide what type of relationship you want with your customers. Social networking is all about building long term relationships. If you're not looking for long term relationships with your customers, social networking is probably not going to be very effective for you.

    4. You've got to be consistent. Your message, your conversations, your persona and your actions on social networking venues need to be consistent with your marketing in other media / venues. And because word travels so much faster in a social networking environment than in other venues, it is critical that your words accurately reflect your actions and vice versa. Nothing gets around social networks quicker than a company claiming perfection but delivering crap.

    5. You've got to know who you are. Know who you are before you venture into this world. If you don't have a clear sense of who you are and what you stand for, people will know it...and they'll tell their friends about your inconsistencies very quickly. So before you start any social networking, make sure you know yourself.

    6. You've got to know your product / service. And finally, you've got to know what it is you have to offer. Your product has got to live up to or exceed your Facebook claims. Your marketing group cannot promise things your operations group can't deliver...and the product's got to meet or exceed your customers' marketing-driven expectations!

    So there it is. Social networking is just another way to reach your customers. It's not going to “change the face of marketing”; although it has definitely increased the speed at which your message...and your mistakes...are spread.
    ____________________________
    I'd love to hear what you think. Feel free to leave a comment here or e-mail me at: TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com.

    Wednesday, September 1, 2010

    Procrastination

    Well, it's three days until the start of the Labor Day weekend. I guess Summer's almost over.
    There's a large part of me (OK, OK, I know - what part of me isn't large?) that's tempted to just screw off the rest of this week, waiting for the holiday. Even though I know that in my situation I really can't afford to just leave work undone for three or four days. As a small business owner / independent contractor, the sooner the work gets done, the sooner I get paid. So I really can't afford to screw off for three days.
    But the temptation is still there...and it's still pretty strong, actually.
    For folks whose weekly pay check is not really tied to the amount of work they do in any given week, the temptation is often irresistible. For some reason, in the week (or two) before a holiday, everything seems less important, and everything is certainly less appealing than kicking back and slacking off to “get ready for the holiday”.
    And it's not all that tough to do.
    Getting in thirty or forty minutes late (“Holiday traffic is starting early this year!”). An extra 10 or 15 minutes at lunch. Thirty or forty minutes talking “business” with my colleague in the next cubicle. Leaving twenty or thirty minutes early (“Gotta beat the holiday rush”).
    It adds up pretty quickly.
    Now that six hours of solid work I give you on a normal day is down to four or five. And of course, there's the hour or two I need to spend playing that on-line game Information Technology (IT) just keeps forgetting to block - mainly because the IT techs are in the middle of a never-ending tournament.
    Now I'm down to two or three hours of distracted (“how the heck do I get into that IT tournament?”) work time.
    Let's face it, it would probably be more productive to just let me take sick time ('cause there's no way I'm going to waste my vacation time) for the next three days.
    Sound familiar?
    Well, even if you won't admit it, I guarantee that even in this bad economy, it's happening in your office as you read this. And if you're reading this at the office, I guess that means you're slacking off, too; surfing the web; doing “research”.
    So how do we stop all this slacking in preparation for the weekend?
    I'll tell you tomorrow.

    ________________________________________________ 

    I'd love to hear what you think. Feel free to leave a comment here or e-mail me at: TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com.

    Friday, August 27, 2010

    Breaking Trust

    Someone very close to me recently did something that violated the trust I had in them and put an almost fourteen year relationship in grave jeopardy.
    In the overall scheme of things, the actual act – petty theft in legal terms – was not an earth-shaking crime. What is so bad is that they crossed a line I never thought they would cross.
    And it's shaken me.
    It's made me question how many other times it's happened, and how many other things they've done that I never thought they would do. It's changed how I feel about them and it's changed how I treat them...and how they treat me. And knowing myself as I do, I'm pretty sure this incident will color my relationship with this person for the rest of both our lives.
    And the funny thing is that when I look at the situation dispassionately (which took me quite some bit of time to be able to do), the fact that it happened is not all that shocking. I knew they had a tendency to take things, but it had always been little things and for some reason which now completely eludes me (and which would probably seem ludicrously illogical if I ever do remember it), I left the stolen item easily accessible, despite my awareness of their problem.
    Some of it was laziness. I didn't want to have to unlock and re-lock the file cabinet each time I needed to access this thing.

    Some of it was that I simply wanted to believe the best about this person - something I'm not sure I'll ever want to do again.

    And some of it, I suppose was just plain stupidity – ignoring the facts that were right in front of me.  Something I'm not usually prone to do.
    I suppose by this point most of you are wondering just what purpose, other than allowing me to vent, this little story could possibly serve you, a business professional.
    Well here it is. Any security officer will tell you that most thefts, most information leaks, and most security breaches are crimes of opportunity. The thief is given an easy, ready opportunity to commit the crime.
    Many times, these individuals see the opportunity early, but resist the temptation a number of times before they give in. The simple act of finding the cabinet locked, the door shut, the papers filed away or the password activated on the screen saver is enough to stop them.
    So, I suppose the point of today's blog is this: take the time to safeguard your “stuff”. It can save you time, money, aggravation and maybe most importantly, it can help others be their “better selves”.

    _______________________________________________________

    I'd love to hear what you think. Feel free to leave a comment here or e-mail me at: TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com.

    Wednesday, August 25, 2010

    How Can My Manager “Manage” Me If She's Never Done My job?


    I suspect this question has been asked by employees, contractors, indentured servants and slaves since the dawn of time.
    Despite the fact that it's usually asked just after we've been directed to do something we see as a huge waste of time, it's actually a valid question. And one that can be argued from either side.
    On the one hand, it is argued that the more a manager (or supervisor) knows about the operations she manages, the better she will be at managing that operation.
    This argument seems to hold up most consistently at the supervisory level. Here, we are dealing with relatively unskilled work where the manager will be expected to train the employees he or she manages in the jobs they are expected to do. In this case, it is imperative that the manager fully understand each job and master all the tasks his subordinates will be expected to do. Additionally, it's helpful if the manager is capable of effectively transmitting that knowledge to his or her subordinates. 
    On the other hand, it is argued that management is a distinct profession with specific skills, a specific base of knowledge and specific tools separate and distinct from the people, projects and things being managed.
    This argument seems to hold up most consistently in situations where the manager is dealing with skilled workers doing jobs the manager may never be qualified to do the work the people he or she is managing are expected to do. A good example of this is a manager running an engineering development or R and D (Research and Development) project. Here, the manager may be expected to plan and control the work of people considered experts in their field who are eminently more qualified in their fields than she can ever hope to be. This doesn't mean that she'll be ineffective as a manager, it just means that she won't be the one designing the new product or conducting the research.
    And this is as it should be. As a manager, she has been hired to plan, organize, schedule, and manage the effort. Her job is to make sure that the experts on her team have the tools they need to get the job done and to shield her team from as much “administrative crap” as possible.
    Of course, this doesn't mean that a supervisor can't be effective simply because he hasn't mastered every job of every person working for him. Nor does it mean that a manager won't get the job done simply because she also happens to be the lead researcher on the project.
    Personally, I think that the more a manger knows about the work to be done, the more effective he or she will be at making sure the team has the right tools, resources and time to get the job done.
    Of course, I could be wrong. 
     What do you think?
    ____________________________

    I'd love to hear what you think. Feel free to leave a comment here or e-mail me at: TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com.

    Monday, August 16, 2010

    Vacation

    Vacation.
    I was going to write a whole long treatise on how valuable vacations can be to reducing stress in the office. How making your people take and use their vacation time can pay dividends for the company in the long run. I was going to mention that even though most folks have trouble getting back to work, the break from routine can help improve creativity in the long run.
    I was going to write a great blog entry.
    But then I looked up from my screen and saw the blue waves crashing onto the beach; the other folks relaxing on the sand, the families building sand castles and I said to myself:
    What the hell am I doing working while I'm on vacation?!?!?”
    Have a great week. I'm gonna shut down and relax.


    If you need help with anything this week, leave a comment here or e-mail me at: mailto:TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com">TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com and I'll get to it on Monday. I can help.

    Wednesday, August 11, 2010

    A Contract Is a Tool. Use It Like One.

    A contract is a is a tool. Like any other tool, the contract is only effective when it's used and maintained.

    Over the years I've worked with a lot of companies who spend a lot of time, money and energy negotiating complex, complicated contracts that spell out in excruciating detail every little task that needs to be done, every little right that needs to be respected and every little punishment for failing to perform. They have big signing ceremonies where both Parties get to hand out gold pens and slap each other on the back, congratulating themselves for a job well done! Everybody is happy. Everybody is sure that the hard part is over now, the contract is signed. All is right with the world.

    Then they print out two copies of that contract, put it into two sets of beautiful binders (because, of course, a single binder won't hold a contract that large), one for each side, and then each side places their binders in a place of honor on a high shelf in the main conference room and then...

    Nothing.

    That's it. That's all they do with that contract; they let it sit on that shelf, allowing the pretty binders to add an air of prosperity and professionalism to the conference room and, I suppose, to the whole company.

    But that's it.

    Of course they show the pretty binders to important clients and vendors. And the C-level's use them as a backdrop for all those semi-annual “see-what-a-great-leader-I-am” webcasts that so inspire “the troops”. Yup, everybody's proud of that contract.

    Problem is, no one ever actually looks at the contract. Most of the folks responsible for performing under the contract will never see it. Few will ever open it, even fewer will ever read it; and virtually none will ever think to use it for the purpose it was intended – as a framework for success in planning, managing and doing the actual day-to-day work.

    And then the unthinkable happens.

    Disagreements between the folks doing the work. Problems arise on the manufacturing floor. Work slows.

    Feelings get hurt. People start to take sides.

    More problems arise. More feelings get hurt. It's “Us” against “Them”, now. Critical designs can't be agreed upon. Critical parts don't fit and don't work right. Money stops.

    Now people get angry. Each side now fully focused on the blame game. Work stops altogether. Both sides now are more intent on pointing fingers and placing blame than in actually doing any work.

    Eventually, of course, some smart person (usually the lawyers who, by this time, are all up in the middle of the finger pointing fight) remembers that there's a contract somewhere that might help us “get those guys”.

    So now they decide to use the contract. Once again, it's a tool they can use. Unfortunately, now the only way any of the folks already involved in the fray can think to use it is as a bludgeon. So they flail around, dragging each other into court, swinging their contractual bludgeon.
    And the work the contract was intended to describe? Well, it never actually gets done. The money all gets spent – on lawyers and courtrooms, incomplete designs, useless parts and the like – but nothing useful ever comes from the debacle. It's too bad, too, because the idea was a really cool one and the product would have sold millions.

    Sound familiar?

    It doesn't have to be this way. Written correctly, used regularly and maintained professionally, the contract could have helped both sides work together harmoniously, identifying risks and solving problems as a team.

    The moral of the story?

    If you're not going to use it, why spend the time, money and aggravation negotiating a contract?

    If your contracts are ineffective or your projects end in disaster more often that not, leave a comment here or e-mail me at: mailto:TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com">TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com. I can help.

    Friday, August 6, 2010

    Little Errors, Big Distractions. Six Tips to Help Improve Your Business Writing!

    Writing for business is a tough thing to do. You've got to come across as intelligent, interesting and rational even when you're writing about the most mundane things. I've assembled 6 tips to help add some polish to your next weekly status report.
    If there's a “First”, there's at least got to be a “Second”...
    ...and if possible, a “Third”, a “Fourth”, etc. I'm not saying the reading public is simple minded or anything, but, if you forget to include at least a “Second” point, the majority of readers will shift focus to finding the “missing” points, rather trying to understand the ideas you are trying to convey. While many will only go off track for a moment or two, even that slight break in flow can have a big impact on how effective your words are.
    Proofread the darned thing!
    If you're expecting your readers to spend their valuable time to wade through your pearls of wisdom, have the common courtesy to take your valuable time to wade through it first to at least find and correct any grammar, usage, and punctuation errors!
    If it's worth taking the time to put it on paper (or into an electronic file), then it's worth taking the time to write it correctly! And that includes, e-mails, text messages, Facebook and LinkedIn messages and every other business communication.
    I find that when I force myself to read aloud each word that's on the screen, it's easier to identify issues, clarify confusing expressions and greatly improve the flow and emotional impact of my writing. It you can get someone else to read or listen to you read) your work, that can be a great help, too.
    Cut The Cute!
    Cute might sell to little girls and Mommies, but it's annoying as hell in business communications unprofessional, too.
    If you want your peers to think you're a joke, your boss to ignore you and your customers to think you're a flake and spineless push-over, just start adding an emoticon to every paragraph, dot every “i” with a heart, and include links to sparkly pictures of unicorns, fairies or fuzzy little animals in your signature block.
    Cut The Words.
    Although it's not always true in fashion, in business communications, brief is beautiful.
    I'm a verbose guy – just ask my wife and kids. Knowing this, however, I force myself to do a lot of cutting before I release even a first draft for other folks to read. It's a good idea if you do the same.
    You're not a lawyer, don't write like one.
    Most lawyers can't even write like a lawyer (should), so what hope is there for you? Big words don't make you look smarter, they make you look pompous and ridiculously out of touch with the real world.
    In business communications, write the way you talk, (unless, of course, you talk like a hillbilly, a gansta, or a seven year old girl (see “cut the cute” above). Use correct, “plain” English (or whatever language they're written in).
    And if “legalese” is absolutely required, call a lawyer, that's what they're paid to do.
    Write Like You've “Got A Pair”.
    Take a stand when you write. Be positive and confident. State your case clearly, concisely and right at the beginning! Then support your position with appropriate facts, figures and “expert” opinions.
    And remember, there's a difference between confident and arrogant. Don't be arrogant (or obnoxious, or annoying, or even abrasive!).
    Follow these tips and you'll be amazed at how much moire effective your writing will be! Remember, though, well written crap is still crap.

    ____________________________

    If you need help writing better crap, leave a comment here or e-mail me at: TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com.

    Monday, August 2, 2010

    Performance Evaluations - Making The Grade More Palatable

    In addition to being a (world class) business consultant and contract negotiator,  I am an educator. A teacher. A college professor, to be exact.

    I tell you this not to brag (well, not entirely!), but because being a teacher means that I spend a lot of time analyzing, evaluating, critiquing and rating (grading) other people's work. It's not my favorite part of the job, but it is, unfortunately, a part of the job.

    And, as will happen with anything one does for more than 20 years, over the years I've been teaching, I've learned a few things. And one of the least obvious, but most important things I've learned is that for many people, receiving an “objective” performance score (grade) on performance quality standards that include some subjectivity, is a real distraction.

    Folks tend to focus first (and longest) on the number you “gave them” and the “points I lost”, rather than on the "points they earned" or the actual quality of their work. They quibble over the minutia of a point or two; ignoring the larger underlying performance issues.  I am more likely to hear “Why did you give me an 84 and not an 86?”, rather than “What do I need to do to earn an “A” next time?”

    I've found this is true not only in academic grading systems, but in employee evaluation systems, as well.

    It seems the more “objective” we try to make our evaluation systems, the more temptation there is for the student / employee to focus on “the number” rather than the performance underlying the number.

    So how do we fix this?  How do we get folks to quit worrying about a point or two and focus on the bigger picture?

    That's a good question.  And here are a few things we as individual evaluators can do to help, regardless of the performance evaluation system(s) we're working with:

    First, a face-to-face meeting where you can take time to explain the evaluation, to identify specific strengths and discuss areas for improvement before giving the “score” is the most effective way I've found. It's critical here to make sure your verbal comments agree with and support your written comments and that both are consistent with the performance score.

    Second, giving them time to read the written evaluation and ask questions / voice disagreements after you've verbally explained the evaluation is critical as well. In the best case, they'll have time to review it immediately following the verbal discussion.

    And finally, listen to objections and complaints with an open mind, and be willing to change the evaluation comments or adjust the score when there is a valid reason to do do. None of us is perfect.

    And finally, always, always, always make sure that you take the above actions before the evaluation is completed and formally entered into the grading / performance evaluation system. This will go a long way toward letting your students/employees know you're doing your best to be fair and unbiased in your assessments...and that is the biggest thing we can do to get their focus off the minutia and on to the larger issues we need them working on!

    ___________________________________________

    If you need help getting your evaluation system more effective, let me help. Either leave a comment here or e-mail me at: TomFawls@Council4SmallBiz.com.

    Search This Blog